Saturday, December 29, 2012

Anthropomorphic Nouns

I thought this might be boring, but stick with it. You'll love the ending.

We are all familiar with:

A herd of cows

A flock of chickens

A school of fish

and a flock of geese

However, less widely know is:

A pride of lions

A murder of crows

(as well as their cousins the rooks and ravens)

An exaltation of doves

And, presumably because they look so wise:

A Parliament of owls

Now consider a group of Baboons.

Baboons are the loudest, most dangerous, most obnoxious, most viciously aggressive and least intelligent of all primates.

And what is the proper collective noun for a group of baboons?

Believe it or not... A Congress!



Sen Feinstein Wants Every Gun and Gun Owner Registered

This goes along with my last posting. I’m not 100% sure that I have to worry about my over/under shotgun, which my father gave to me after my mother won it in a raffle. All I’ve got is bird shot for the thing, so it would be considered a gun for hunting, but I’m not holding my breath that hunting guns will be grandfathered in. I know they will eventually include guns of any kind to be registered.

posted on December 29, 2012 by da Tagliare

Most control laws have grandfather exemptions. In other words, if you have owned a gun for over twenty years, you don’t need to undergo a background check. If your parents or grandparents gave you a gun that transfer of ownership didn’t have to be recorded either. If you bought a gun from a gun show or another person, that also didn’t need to be recorded.

But Sen. Diane Feinstein (D-CA), Chairman of the Senate Select Committee on Intelligence (which is a definite contradiction in terms), wants to change all of that. After the first of the year, she is planning on introducing a massive new gun control bill that will require every gun owner, regardless of any grandfather clause, to be fingerprinted and have a background check run on them. The bill will also require every gun in the nation to be registered, regardless of how old it is or how you obtained it.

I’ve got an elderly family member who has a WW II Japanese rifle. He got this rifle from his uncle who was in Okinawa during the tail end of WW II as a part of our Army occupation forces. This family member of mine hasn’t fired this weapon because he’s worried about bananaing the barrel and I don’t blame him. Looks like he would have to register this weapon if Feinstein gets her way! What a crock!

Here is a summary, taken from her own website, of the legislation she plans on introducing this next year and take special note to the last major bullet point:

Bans the sale, transfer, importation, or manufacturing of:

  • 120 specifically-named firearms
  • Certain other semiautomatic rifles, handguns, shotguns that can accept a detachable magazine and have one or more military characteristics
  • Semiautomatic rifles and handguns with a fixed magazine that can accept more than 10 rounds.

Strengthens the 1994 Assault Weapons Ban and various state bans by:

  • Moving from a 2-characteristic test to a 1-characteristic test
  • Eliminating the easy-to-remove bayonet mounts and flash suppressors from the characteristics test
  • Banning firearms with “thumbhole stocks” and “bullet buttons” to address attempts to “work around” prior bans
  • Bans large-capacity ammunition feeding devices capable of accepting more than 10 rounds

Protects legitimate hunters [DUH!!! The 2nd Amendment says NOTHING about Hunting – Militia it IS!!!] and the rights of existing gun owners by:

  • Grandfathering weapons legally possessed on the date of enactment
  • Exempting over 900 specifically-named weapons used for hunting or sporting purposes [DUH!!! The 2nd Amendment says NOTHING about Hunting – Militia it IS!!!]
  • Exempting antique, manually-operated, and permanently disabled weapons

Well maybe my family member might not have to register that Japanese rifle. It looks like it would depend if that rifle could be considered an "antique".

Requires that grandfathered weapons be registered under the National Firearms Act, to include:

  • Background check of owner and any transferee
  • Type and serial number of the firearm
  • Positive identification, including photograph and fingerprint
  • Certification from local law enforcement of identity and that possession would not violate State or local law
  • Dedicated funding for ATF to implement registration.

Legislation like this is one of the key steps to the hostile takeover of a nation.

It has happened before in places like Germany and Russia and could well happen here. Once they know where all the guns are, then they will systematically try to confiscate them for one reason of another.

The scary thing is that there is a growing number of senators, including Republicans, that are beginning to talk about the need for more gun control after the shootings at Sandy Hook Elementary School. If by any chance this gets passed, I fear that a number of law enforcement officers will be wounded or killed by gun owners who refuse to comply with the new communist law.

Feinstein and her liberal communist legislation must be stopped at all costs.

Write, call, email or speak in person to your senator and congressman/woman and demand that they fight against this illegal legislation.

You can find your senator(s) and how to contact him/her at the Senate’s official web site. You can find your representative(s) and how to contact him/her at the House of Representative’s official web site.

Our Founding Fathers knew the importance of keeping the people well-armed and today’s liberals are out to destroy that strength with whatever means they can.

Read more: http://godfatherpolitics.com/8753/sen-feinstein-wants-every-gun-and-gun-owner-registered/#ixzz2GTEg2QWo

Arm Teachers Instead of Disarming Americans

I got this from a friend of mine. I'll be making my own comments on this article in my usual bold red font type.

posted on December 19, 2012 by da Tagliare

Gun control! Gun control! Gun control!

You can't look anywhere on the news or internet without seeing the cries for more gun control in wake of last Friday's massacre in Newtown, CT.

There is no escaping the tears of remorse and cries of anger that have flooded every media outlet in the nation.

But let's set raw emotion aside for a second and look at reality.

First and foremost, the guns did NOT kill those children and adults in Connecticut, it was [No Name]. The guns did not load themselves, it was Adam Lanza, and the guns did not pull the trigger, it was [No Name].

It's already a well-known fact that Connecticut had some of the strictest gun control laws in the nation, but [No Name] didn't care about the law.

Some of the other areas of our nation that have the highest crime rates also have strict gun control laws, but laws rarely stop people that are determined to commit violent acts on other people.

And that’s what really gets me. I don’t see why people think that gun control will end gun violence because it never has.

Mayor Bloomberg has enacted strict guns laws in New York City, yet the city boosts one of the highest rates of gun violence in America.

In our nation’s capitol, Washington D.C., there is a total ban on guns of any kind. You can’t legally own a gun or even have one within the city, yet the city boosts the highest gun violence rate in America!

There have been other instances of gun violence where guns were actually banned.

What about the shooting in the Colorado movie theater?

James Holmes could have gone to a theater near where he lived, but he didn’t. Know why? The one he went to had a no guns on premises rule; the ones near where he lived didn’t have that rule. He knew that he would be the only one in the theater with a gun!

It's like Sean Hannity says.... Evil people will find a way to commit evil. They won’t care about legally owning a gun; if they want one, they will get one.

But on to the rest of this posting...

So what is the solution?

How about taking a look at what works in other countries like Thailand and Israel. Both countries have active terrorist threats against school children by Muslim extremists and Jihadists. In an effort to prevent a similar shooting at their schools, they have been arming their teachers. Many teachers in Israel and Thailand now carry concealed handguns with them.

The Israeli government told the people that they would protect them and they created gun-free zones in the country. Those zones soon became known as victim disarmament zones.

In 1974, jihadist terrorists attacked Israeli school children on a field trip to a tobacco farm. The attack killed 25 and wounded 66 other. In 1978, terrorists attacked an Israeli school bus, killing 37 children and wounding 76 other people.

Israeli people had enough of the gun free zones and failed promises of government protection.

Instead of tightening up gun control laws, they started arming teachers and others and trained them how to protect their students.

In 2002, Jihadists tried to enter an Israeli school, only to be repelled by armed teachers.

In another incident, a suicide bomber that was intending on blowing himself up at an Israeli school was shot and killed by an armed teacher before he was able to detonate the bomb.

The threat of violence against school children is still high in Israel and Thailand, but we don’t hear nearly as many successful attacks being carried out since they started arming teachers. Their programs have proven to be very successful and I believe we should implement the same thing here.

Let’s arm our teachers before we disarm the people.

Read more: http://godfatherpolitics.com/8614/arm-teachers-instead-of-disarming-americans/#ixzz2FWZa3kN1

Forward this message to a friend

Saturday, December 22, 2012

Obama Claus

You better not work
You better not try
You better not earn
I'm telling you why
Obama Claus is coming to town

He sees you when you're building
He wants what you all make
He’ll tell the 47 percent
That being rich is a mistake

Oh you better not work
You better not try
You better not earn
I'm telling you why
Obama Claus is coming to town

He'll give you a free cell phone
To say Obamacare is great
He'll tell you being a success
Is something you should hate

Oh you better not work
You better not try
You better not earn
I'm telling you why
Obama Claus is coooming tooo tooown

Sunday, December 16, 2012

SOCIAL SECURITY NOW CALLED 'FEDERAL BENEFIT PAYMENT'/ENTITLEMENT!

Have you noticed, your Social Security check is now referred to as a "Federal Benefit Payment"?

I'll be part of the one percent to forward this. I am forwarding it because it touches a nerve in me, and I hope it will in you. Please keep passing it on until everyone in our country has read it.

The government is now referring to our Social Security checks as a “Federal Benefit Payment.” This isn’t a benefit – its earned income! Not only did we all contribute to Social Security but our employers did too.

It totaled 15% of our income before taxes. If you averaged $30K per year over your working life, that's close to $180,000 invested in Social Security. If you calculate the future value of your monthly investment in social security ($375/month, including both your and your employer’s contributions) at a meager 1% interest rate compounded monthly, after 40 years of working you'd have more than $1.3+ million dollars saved!

This is your personal investment, assuming you worked and paid your social security tax.

Upon retirement, if you took out only 3% per year, you'd receive $39,318 per year, or $3,277 per month. That’s almost three times more than today’s average Social Security benefit of $1,230 per month, according to the Social Security Administration (Google it - it’s a fact).

And your retirement fund would last more than 33 years (until you're 98 if you retire at age 65)! I can only imagine how much better most average-income people could live in retirement if our government had just invested our money in low-risk interest-earning accounts.

Instead, the folks in Washington pulled off a bigger Ponzi scheme than Bernie Madoff ever did. They took our money and used it elsewhere. They “forgot” that it was OUR money they were taking. They didn’t have a referendum to ask us if we wanted to lend the money to them.

And they didn’t pay interest on the debt they assumed. And recently, they’ve told us that the money won’t support us for very much longer. But is it our fault they misused our investments?

And now, to add insult to injury, they’re calling it a “benefit,” as if we never worked to earn every penny of it. Just because they “borrowed” the money, doesn't mean that our investments were a charity! Let’s take a stand.

We have earned our right to Social Security and Medicare. Demand that our legislators bring some sense into our government –

Then call it what it is: Our Earned Retirement Income.

99% of people won't forward this.

Will you?

Saturday, December 1, 2012

Charley Reese's Final column

A very interesting column… COMPLETELY NEUTRAL…
Be sure to Read the Poem at the end.

Charley Reese's final column for the Orlando Sentinel... He has been a journalist for 49 years. He is retiring and this is HIS LAST COLUMN.

Be sure to read the Tax List at the end.

This is about as clear and easy to understand as it can be. The article below is completely neutral, neither anti-republican or democrat. Charlie Reese, a retired reporter for the Orlando Sentinel, has hit the nail directly on the head, defining clearly who it is that in the final analysis must assume responsibility for the judgments made that impact each one of us every day. It's a short but good read. Worth the time. Worth remembering!

545 vs. 300,000,000 People
-By Charlie Reese

Politicians are the only people in the world who create problems and then campaign against them.

Have you ever wondered, if both the Democrats and the Republicans are against deficits, WHY do we have deficits?

Have you ever wondered, if all the politicians are against inflation and high taxes, WHY do we have inflation and high taxes?

You and I don't propose a federal budget. The President does.

You and I don't have the Constitutional authority to vote on appropriations. The House of Representatives does.

You and I don't write the tax code, Congress does.

You and I don't set fiscal policy, Congress does.

You and I don't control monetary policy, the Federal Reserve Bank does.

One hundred senators, 435 congressmen, one President, and nine Supreme Court justices equates to 545 human beings out of the 300 million are directly, legally, morally, and individually responsible for the domestic problems that plague this country.

I excluded the members of the Federal Reserve Board because that problem was created by the Congress. In 1913, Congress delegated its Constitutional duty to provide a sound currency to a federally chartered, but private, central bank.

I excluded all the special interests and lobbyists for a sound reason. They have no legal authority. They have no ability to coerce a senator, a congressman, or a President to do one cotton-picking thing. I don't care if they offer a politician $1 million dollars in cash. The politician has the power to accept or reject it. No matter what the lobbyist promises, it is the legislator's responsibility to determine how he votes.

Those 545 human beings spend much of their energy convincing you that what they did is not their fault. They cooperate in this common con regardless of party.

What separates a politician from a normal human being is an excessive amount of gall. No normal human being would have the gall of a Speaker, who stood up and criticized the President for creating deficits. The President can only propose a budget. He cannot force the Congress to accept it.

The Constitution, which is the supreme law of the land, gives sole responsibility to the House of Representatives for originating and approving appropriations and taxes. Who is the speaker of the House? John Boehner. He is the leader of the majority party. He and fellow House members, not the President, can approve any budget they want. If the President vetoes it, they can pass it over his veto if they agree to. [The House has passes a budget but the Senate has not approved a budget in over three years. The President's proposed budgets have gotten almost unanimous rejections in the Senate in that time.]

It seems inconceivable to me that a nation of 300 million cannot replace 545 people who stand convicted -- by present facts -- of incompetence and irresponsibility. I can't think of a single domestic problem that is not traceable directly to those 545 people. When you fully grasp the plain truth that 545 people exercise the power of the federal government, then it must follow that what exists is what they want to exist.

If the tax code is unfair, it's because they want it unfair.

If the budget is in the red, it's because they want it in the red.

If the Army & Marines are in Iraq and Afghanistan it's because they want them in Iraq and Afghanistan...

If they do not receive social security but are on an elite retirement plan not available to the people, it's because they want it that way.

There are no insoluble government problems.

Do not let these 545 people shift the blame to bureaucrats, whom they hire and whose jobs they can abolish; to lobbyists, whose gifts and advice they can reject; to regulators, to whom they give the power to regulate and from whom they can take this power.

Above all, do not let them con you into the belief that there exists disembodied mystical forces like "the economy," "inflation," or "politics" that prevent them from doing what they take an oath to do.

Those 545 people, and they alone, are responsible. They, and they alone, have the power.

They, and they alone, should be held accountable by the people who are their bosses. Provided the voters have the gumption to manage their own employees... We should vote all of them out of office and clean up their mess!

Charlie Reese is a former columnist of the Orlando Sentinel Newspaper.

What you do with this article now that you have read it... is up to you. This might be funny if it weren't so true.

Be sure to read all the way to the end:

Tax his land,
Tax his bed,
Tax the table,
At which he's fed.

Tax his tractor,
Tax his mule,
Teach him taxes
Are the rule.

Tax his work,
Tax his pay,
He works for
peanuts anyway!

Tax his cow,
Tax his goat,
Tax his pants,
Tax his coat.

Tax his ties,
Tax his shirt,
Tax his work,
Tax his dirt.

Tax his tobacco,
Tax his drink,
Tax him if he
Tries to think.

Tax his cigars,
Tax his beers,
If he cries
Tax his tears.

Tax his car,
Tax his gas,
Find other ways
To tax his ass.

Tax all he has
Then let him know
That you won't be done
Till he has no dough.

When he screams and hollers;
Then tax him some more,
Tax him till
He's good and sore.

Then tax his coffin,
Tax his grave,
Tax the sod in
Which he's laid...

Put these words
Upon his tomb,
'Taxes drove me
to my doom...'

When he's gone,
Do not relax,
Its time to apply
The inheritance tax.

Accounts Receivable Tax
Building Permit Tax
CDL license Tax
Cigarette Tax
Corporate Income Tax
Dog License Tax
Excise Taxes
Federal Income Tax
Federal Unemployment Tax (FUTA)
Fishing License Tax
Food License Tax
Fuel Permit Tax
Gasoline Tax (currently 44.75 cents per gallon)
Gross Receipts Tax
Hunting License Tax
Inheritance Tax
Inventory Tax
IRS Interest Charges IRS Penalties (tax on top of tax)
Liquor Tax
Luxury Taxes
Marriage License Tax
Medicare Tax
Personal Property Tax
Property Tax
Real Estate Tax
Service Charge Tax
Social Security Tax
Road Usage Tax
Recreational Vehicle Tax
Sales Tax
School Tax
State Income Tax
State Unemployment Tax (SUTA)
Telephone Federal Excise Tax
Telephone Federal Universal Service Fee Tax
Telephone Federal, State and Local Surcharge Taxes
Telephone Minimum Usage Surcharge Tax
Telephone Recurring and Nonrecurring Charges Tax
Telephone State and Local Tax
Telephone Usage Charge Tax
Utility Taxes
Vehicle License Registration Tax
Vehicle Sales Tax
Watercraft Registration Tax
Well Permit Tax
Workers Compensation Tax

STILL THINK THIS IS FUNNY?

Not one of these taxes existed 100 years ago, & our nation was the most prosperous in the world. We had absolutely no national debt, had the largest middle class in the world, and Mom stayed home to raise the kids.

What in the heck happened? Can you spell 'politicians?'

I hope this goes around THE USA at least 545 times!!! YOU can help it get there!!!

GO AHEAD. . . BE AN AMERICAN!!!

The Cow and the Ice Cream

ONE OF THE BEST THEORIES OF WHY OBAMA WON THE ELECTION

From a teacher

We are worried about 'the cow' when it is all about the 'Ice Cream'."

The most eye-opening civics lesson I ever had was while teaching 3rd grade. The last Presidential election was heating up and some of the children showed an interest. I decided we would have an election for a class president. We would choose our nominees. They would make a campaign speech and the class would vote. To simplify the process, candidates were nominated by other class members. We discussed what kinds of characteristics these students should have. We got many nominations and from those, Jamie and Olivia were picked to run for the top spot. The class had done a great job in their selections. Both candidates were good kids.

I thought Jamie might have an advantage because he got lots of parental support. I had never seen Olivia's mother.

The day arrived when they were to make their speeches. Jamie went first.

He had specific ideas about how to make our class a better place. He ended by promising to do his very best. Everyone applauded and he sat down.

Now is was Olivia's turn to speak.

Her speech was concise. She said, "If you will vote for me, I will give you ice cream." She sat down.

The class went wild. "Yes! Yes! We want ice cream."

She surely would say more. She did not have to.

A discussion followed. How did she plan to pay for the ice cream? She wasn't sure. But no one pursued that question. They took her at her word. Would her parents buy it or would the class pay for it...She didn't know. The class really didn't care. All they were thinking about was ice cream...

Jamie was forgotten. Olivia won by a landslide.

Every time Barack Obama opened his mouth he offered ice cream and 51.4 % of the people reacted like nine year old's. They want ice cream.

The other 48.6% percent know they're going to have to feed the cow and clean up the mess."

This is the ice cream Obama promised us!

Remember, the government cannot give anything to anyone that they have not first taken away from someone else. Did you vote for the ice cream?

THAT MY FRIEND, IS HOW OBAMA GOT ELECTED...

BY THOSE WHO WANT EVERYTHING FOR FREE!