Saturday, December 29, 2012

Anthropomorphic Nouns

I thought this might be boring, but stick with it. You'll love the ending.

We are all familiar with:

A herd of cows

A flock of chickens

A school of fish

and a flock of geese

However, less widely know is:

A pride of lions

A murder of crows

(as well as their cousins the rooks and ravens)

An exaltation of doves

And, presumably because they look so wise:

A Parliament of owls

Now consider a group of Baboons.

Baboons are the loudest, most dangerous, most obnoxious, most viciously aggressive and least intelligent of all primates.

And what is the proper collective noun for a group of baboons?

Believe it or not... A Congress!



Sen Feinstein Wants Every Gun and Gun Owner Registered

This goes along with my last posting. I’m not 100% sure that I have to worry about my over/under shotgun, which my father gave to me after my mother won it in a raffle. All I’ve got is bird shot for the thing, so it would be considered a gun for hunting, but I’m not holding my breath that hunting guns will be grandfathered in. I know they will eventually include guns of any kind to be registered.

posted on December 29, 2012 by da Tagliare

Most control laws have grandfather exemptions. In other words, if you have owned a gun for over twenty years, you don’t need to undergo a background check. If your parents or grandparents gave you a gun that transfer of ownership didn’t have to be recorded either. If you bought a gun from a gun show or another person, that also didn’t need to be recorded.

But Sen. Diane Feinstein (D-CA), Chairman of the Senate Select Committee on Intelligence (which is a definite contradiction in terms), wants to change all of that. After the first of the year, she is planning on introducing a massive new gun control bill that will require every gun owner, regardless of any grandfather clause, to be fingerprinted and have a background check run on them. The bill will also require every gun in the nation to be registered, regardless of how old it is or how you obtained it.

I’ve got an elderly family member who has a WW II Japanese rifle. He got this rifle from his uncle who was in Okinawa during the tail end of WW II as a part of our Army occupation forces. This family member of mine hasn’t fired this weapon because he’s worried about bananaing the barrel and I don’t blame him. Looks like he would have to register this weapon if Feinstein gets her way! What a crock!

Here is a summary, taken from her own website, of the legislation she plans on introducing this next year and take special note to the last major bullet point:

Bans the sale, transfer, importation, or manufacturing of:

  • 120 specifically-named firearms
  • Certain other semiautomatic rifles, handguns, shotguns that can accept a detachable magazine and have one or more military characteristics
  • Semiautomatic rifles and handguns with a fixed magazine that can accept more than 10 rounds.

Strengthens the 1994 Assault Weapons Ban and various state bans by:

  • Moving from a 2-characteristic test to a 1-characteristic test
  • Eliminating the easy-to-remove bayonet mounts and flash suppressors from the characteristics test
  • Banning firearms with “thumbhole stocks” and “bullet buttons” to address attempts to “work around” prior bans
  • Bans large-capacity ammunition feeding devices capable of accepting more than 10 rounds

Protects legitimate hunters [DUH!!! The 2nd Amendment says NOTHING about Hunting – Militia it IS!!!] and the rights of existing gun owners by:

  • Grandfathering weapons legally possessed on the date of enactment
  • Exempting over 900 specifically-named weapons used for hunting or sporting purposes [DUH!!! The 2nd Amendment says NOTHING about Hunting – Militia it IS!!!]
  • Exempting antique, manually-operated, and permanently disabled weapons

Well maybe my family member might not have to register that Japanese rifle. It looks like it would depend if that rifle could be considered an "antique".

Requires that grandfathered weapons be registered under the National Firearms Act, to include:

  • Background check of owner and any transferee
  • Type and serial number of the firearm
  • Positive identification, including photograph and fingerprint
  • Certification from local law enforcement of identity and that possession would not violate State or local law
  • Dedicated funding for ATF to implement registration.

Legislation like this is one of the key steps to the hostile takeover of a nation.

It has happened before in places like Germany and Russia and could well happen here. Once they know where all the guns are, then they will systematically try to confiscate them for one reason of another.

The scary thing is that there is a growing number of senators, including Republicans, that are beginning to talk about the need for more gun control after the shootings at Sandy Hook Elementary School. If by any chance this gets passed, I fear that a number of law enforcement officers will be wounded or killed by gun owners who refuse to comply with the new communist law.

Feinstein and her liberal communist legislation must be stopped at all costs.

Write, call, email or speak in person to your senator and congressman/woman and demand that they fight against this illegal legislation.

You can find your senator(s) and how to contact him/her at the Senate’s official web site. You can find your representative(s) and how to contact him/her at the House of Representative’s official web site.

Our Founding Fathers knew the importance of keeping the people well-armed and today’s liberals are out to destroy that strength with whatever means they can.

Read more: http://godfatherpolitics.com/8753/sen-feinstein-wants-every-gun-and-gun-owner-registered/#ixzz2GTEg2QWo

Arm Teachers Instead of Disarming Americans

I got this from a friend of mine. I'll be making my own comments on this article in my usual bold red font type.

posted on December 19, 2012 by da Tagliare

Gun control! Gun control! Gun control!

You can't look anywhere on the news or internet without seeing the cries for more gun control in wake of last Friday's massacre in Newtown, CT.

There is no escaping the tears of remorse and cries of anger that have flooded every media outlet in the nation.

But let's set raw emotion aside for a second and look at reality.

First and foremost, the guns did NOT kill those children and adults in Connecticut, it was [No Name]. The guns did not load themselves, it was Adam Lanza, and the guns did not pull the trigger, it was [No Name].

It's already a well-known fact that Connecticut had some of the strictest gun control laws in the nation, but [No Name] didn't care about the law.

Some of the other areas of our nation that have the highest crime rates also have strict gun control laws, but laws rarely stop people that are determined to commit violent acts on other people.

And that’s what really gets me. I don’t see why people think that gun control will end gun violence because it never has.

Mayor Bloomberg has enacted strict guns laws in New York City, yet the city boosts one of the highest rates of gun violence in America.

In our nation’s capitol, Washington D.C., there is a total ban on guns of any kind. You can’t legally own a gun or even have one within the city, yet the city boosts the highest gun violence rate in America!

There have been other instances of gun violence where guns were actually banned.

What about the shooting in the Colorado movie theater?

James Holmes could have gone to a theater near where he lived, but he didn’t. Know why? The one he went to had a no guns on premises rule; the ones near where he lived didn’t have that rule. He knew that he would be the only one in the theater with a gun!

It's like Sean Hannity says.... Evil people will find a way to commit evil. They won’t care about legally owning a gun; if they want one, they will get one.

But on to the rest of this posting...

So what is the solution?

How about taking a look at what works in other countries like Thailand and Israel. Both countries have active terrorist threats against school children by Muslim extremists and Jihadists. In an effort to prevent a similar shooting at their schools, they have been arming their teachers. Many teachers in Israel and Thailand now carry concealed handguns with them.

The Israeli government told the people that they would protect them and they created gun-free zones in the country. Those zones soon became known as victim disarmament zones.

In 1974, jihadist terrorists attacked Israeli school children on a field trip to a tobacco farm. The attack killed 25 and wounded 66 other. In 1978, terrorists attacked an Israeli school bus, killing 37 children and wounding 76 other people.

Israeli people had enough of the gun free zones and failed promises of government protection.

Instead of tightening up gun control laws, they started arming teachers and others and trained them how to protect their students.

In 2002, Jihadists tried to enter an Israeli school, only to be repelled by armed teachers.

In another incident, a suicide bomber that was intending on blowing himself up at an Israeli school was shot and killed by an armed teacher before he was able to detonate the bomb.

The threat of violence against school children is still high in Israel and Thailand, but we don’t hear nearly as many successful attacks being carried out since they started arming teachers. Their programs have proven to be very successful and I believe we should implement the same thing here.

Let’s arm our teachers before we disarm the people.

Read more: http://godfatherpolitics.com/8614/arm-teachers-instead-of-disarming-americans/#ixzz2FWZa3kN1

Forward this message to a friend

Saturday, December 22, 2012

Obama Claus

You better not work
You better not try
You better not earn
I'm telling you why
Obama Claus is coming to town

He sees you when you're building
He wants what you all make
He’ll tell the 47 percent
That being rich is a mistake

Oh you better not work
You better not try
You better not earn
I'm telling you why
Obama Claus is coming to town

He'll give you a free cell phone
To say Obamacare is great
He'll tell you being a success
Is something you should hate

Oh you better not work
You better not try
You better not earn
I'm telling you why
Obama Claus is coooming tooo tooown

Sunday, December 16, 2012

SOCIAL SECURITY NOW CALLED 'FEDERAL BENEFIT PAYMENT'/ENTITLEMENT!

Have you noticed, your Social Security check is now referred to as a "Federal Benefit Payment"?

I'll be part of the one percent to forward this. I am forwarding it because it touches a nerve in me, and I hope it will in you. Please keep passing it on until everyone in our country has read it.

The government is now referring to our Social Security checks as a “Federal Benefit Payment.” This isn’t a benefit – its earned income! Not only did we all contribute to Social Security but our employers did too.

It totaled 15% of our income before taxes. If you averaged $30K per year over your working life, that's close to $180,000 invested in Social Security. If you calculate the future value of your monthly investment in social security ($375/month, including both your and your employer’s contributions) at a meager 1% interest rate compounded monthly, after 40 years of working you'd have more than $1.3+ million dollars saved!

This is your personal investment, assuming you worked and paid your social security tax.

Upon retirement, if you took out only 3% per year, you'd receive $39,318 per year, or $3,277 per month. That’s almost three times more than today’s average Social Security benefit of $1,230 per month, according to the Social Security Administration (Google it - it’s a fact).

And your retirement fund would last more than 33 years (until you're 98 if you retire at age 65)! I can only imagine how much better most average-income people could live in retirement if our government had just invested our money in low-risk interest-earning accounts.

Instead, the folks in Washington pulled off a bigger Ponzi scheme than Bernie Madoff ever did. They took our money and used it elsewhere. They “forgot” that it was OUR money they were taking. They didn’t have a referendum to ask us if we wanted to lend the money to them.

And they didn’t pay interest on the debt they assumed. And recently, they’ve told us that the money won’t support us for very much longer. But is it our fault they misused our investments?

And now, to add insult to injury, they’re calling it a “benefit,” as if we never worked to earn every penny of it. Just because they “borrowed” the money, doesn't mean that our investments were a charity! Let’s take a stand.

We have earned our right to Social Security and Medicare. Demand that our legislators bring some sense into our government –

Then call it what it is: Our Earned Retirement Income.

99% of people won't forward this.

Will you?

Saturday, December 1, 2012

Charley Reese's Final column

A very interesting column… COMPLETELY NEUTRAL…
Be sure to Read the Poem at the end.

Charley Reese's final column for the Orlando Sentinel... He has been a journalist for 49 years. He is retiring and this is HIS LAST COLUMN.

Be sure to read the Tax List at the end.

This is about as clear and easy to understand as it can be. The article below is completely neutral, neither anti-republican or democrat. Charlie Reese, a retired reporter for the Orlando Sentinel, has hit the nail directly on the head, defining clearly who it is that in the final analysis must assume responsibility for the judgments made that impact each one of us every day. It's a short but good read. Worth the time. Worth remembering!

545 vs. 300,000,000 People
-By Charlie Reese

Politicians are the only people in the world who create problems and then campaign against them.

Have you ever wondered, if both the Democrats and the Republicans are against deficits, WHY do we have deficits?

Have you ever wondered, if all the politicians are against inflation and high taxes, WHY do we have inflation and high taxes?

You and I don't propose a federal budget. The President does.

You and I don't have the Constitutional authority to vote on appropriations. The House of Representatives does.

You and I don't write the tax code, Congress does.

You and I don't set fiscal policy, Congress does.

You and I don't control monetary policy, the Federal Reserve Bank does.

One hundred senators, 435 congressmen, one President, and nine Supreme Court justices equates to 545 human beings out of the 300 million are directly, legally, morally, and individually responsible for the domestic problems that plague this country.

I excluded the members of the Federal Reserve Board because that problem was created by the Congress. In 1913, Congress delegated its Constitutional duty to provide a sound currency to a federally chartered, but private, central bank.

I excluded all the special interests and lobbyists for a sound reason. They have no legal authority. They have no ability to coerce a senator, a congressman, or a President to do one cotton-picking thing. I don't care if they offer a politician $1 million dollars in cash. The politician has the power to accept or reject it. No matter what the lobbyist promises, it is the legislator's responsibility to determine how he votes.

Those 545 human beings spend much of their energy convincing you that what they did is not their fault. They cooperate in this common con regardless of party.

What separates a politician from a normal human being is an excessive amount of gall. No normal human being would have the gall of a Speaker, who stood up and criticized the President for creating deficits. The President can only propose a budget. He cannot force the Congress to accept it.

The Constitution, which is the supreme law of the land, gives sole responsibility to the House of Representatives for originating and approving appropriations and taxes. Who is the speaker of the House? John Boehner. He is the leader of the majority party. He and fellow House members, not the President, can approve any budget they want. If the President vetoes it, they can pass it over his veto if they agree to. [The House has passes a budget but the Senate has not approved a budget in over three years. The President's proposed budgets have gotten almost unanimous rejections in the Senate in that time.]

It seems inconceivable to me that a nation of 300 million cannot replace 545 people who stand convicted -- by present facts -- of incompetence and irresponsibility. I can't think of a single domestic problem that is not traceable directly to those 545 people. When you fully grasp the plain truth that 545 people exercise the power of the federal government, then it must follow that what exists is what they want to exist.

If the tax code is unfair, it's because they want it unfair.

If the budget is in the red, it's because they want it in the red.

If the Army & Marines are in Iraq and Afghanistan it's because they want them in Iraq and Afghanistan...

If they do not receive social security but are on an elite retirement plan not available to the people, it's because they want it that way.

There are no insoluble government problems.

Do not let these 545 people shift the blame to bureaucrats, whom they hire and whose jobs they can abolish; to lobbyists, whose gifts and advice they can reject; to regulators, to whom they give the power to regulate and from whom they can take this power.

Above all, do not let them con you into the belief that there exists disembodied mystical forces like "the economy," "inflation," or "politics" that prevent them from doing what they take an oath to do.

Those 545 people, and they alone, are responsible. They, and they alone, have the power.

They, and they alone, should be held accountable by the people who are their bosses. Provided the voters have the gumption to manage their own employees... We should vote all of them out of office and clean up their mess!

Charlie Reese is a former columnist of the Orlando Sentinel Newspaper.

What you do with this article now that you have read it... is up to you. This might be funny if it weren't so true.

Be sure to read all the way to the end:

Tax his land,
Tax his bed,
Tax the table,
At which he's fed.

Tax his tractor,
Tax his mule,
Teach him taxes
Are the rule.

Tax his work,
Tax his pay,
He works for
peanuts anyway!

Tax his cow,
Tax his goat,
Tax his pants,
Tax his coat.

Tax his ties,
Tax his shirt,
Tax his work,
Tax his dirt.

Tax his tobacco,
Tax his drink,
Tax him if he
Tries to think.

Tax his cigars,
Tax his beers,
If he cries
Tax his tears.

Tax his car,
Tax his gas,
Find other ways
To tax his ass.

Tax all he has
Then let him know
That you won't be done
Till he has no dough.

When he screams and hollers;
Then tax him some more,
Tax him till
He's good and sore.

Then tax his coffin,
Tax his grave,
Tax the sod in
Which he's laid...

Put these words
Upon his tomb,
'Taxes drove me
to my doom...'

When he's gone,
Do not relax,
Its time to apply
The inheritance tax.

Accounts Receivable Tax
Building Permit Tax
CDL license Tax
Cigarette Tax
Corporate Income Tax
Dog License Tax
Excise Taxes
Federal Income Tax
Federal Unemployment Tax (FUTA)
Fishing License Tax
Food License Tax
Fuel Permit Tax
Gasoline Tax (currently 44.75 cents per gallon)
Gross Receipts Tax
Hunting License Tax
Inheritance Tax
Inventory Tax
IRS Interest Charges IRS Penalties (tax on top of tax)
Liquor Tax
Luxury Taxes
Marriage License Tax
Medicare Tax
Personal Property Tax
Property Tax
Real Estate Tax
Service Charge Tax
Social Security Tax
Road Usage Tax
Recreational Vehicle Tax
Sales Tax
School Tax
State Income Tax
State Unemployment Tax (SUTA)
Telephone Federal Excise Tax
Telephone Federal Universal Service Fee Tax
Telephone Federal, State and Local Surcharge Taxes
Telephone Minimum Usage Surcharge Tax
Telephone Recurring and Nonrecurring Charges Tax
Telephone State and Local Tax
Telephone Usage Charge Tax
Utility Taxes
Vehicle License Registration Tax
Vehicle Sales Tax
Watercraft Registration Tax
Well Permit Tax
Workers Compensation Tax

STILL THINK THIS IS FUNNY?

Not one of these taxes existed 100 years ago, & our nation was the most prosperous in the world. We had absolutely no national debt, had the largest middle class in the world, and Mom stayed home to raise the kids.

What in the heck happened? Can you spell 'politicians?'

I hope this goes around THE USA at least 545 times!!! YOU can help it get there!!!

GO AHEAD. . . BE AN AMERICAN!!!

The Cow and the Ice Cream

ONE OF THE BEST THEORIES OF WHY OBAMA WON THE ELECTION

From a teacher

We are worried about 'the cow' when it is all about the 'Ice Cream'."

The most eye-opening civics lesson I ever had was while teaching 3rd grade. The last Presidential election was heating up and some of the children showed an interest. I decided we would have an election for a class president. We would choose our nominees. They would make a campaign speech and the class would vote. To simplify the process, candidates were nominated by other class members. We discussed what kinds of characteristics these students should have. We got many nominations and from those, Jamie and Olivia were picked to run for the top spot. The class had done a great job in their selections. Both candidates were good kids.

I thought Jamie might have an advantage because he got lots of parental support. I had never seen Olivia's mother.

The day arrived when they were to make their speeches. Jamie went first.

He had specific ideas about how to make our class a better place. He ended by promising to do his very best. Everyone applauded and he sat down.

Now is was Olivia's turn to speak.

Her speech was concise. She said, "If you will vote for me, I will give you ice cream." She sat down.

The class went wild. "Yes! Yes! We want ice cream."

She surely would say more. She did not have to.

A discussion followed. How did she plan to pay for the ice cream? She wasn't sure. But no one pursued that question. They took her at her word. Would her parents buy it or would the class pay for it...She didn't know. The class really didn't care. All they were thinking about was ice cream...

Jamie was forgotten. Olivia won by a landslide.

Every time Barack Obama opened his mouth he offered ice cream and 51.4 % of the people reacted like nine year old's. They want ice cream.

The other 48.6% percent know they're going to have to feed the cow and clean up the mess."

This is the ice cream Obama promised us!

Remember, the government cannot give anything to anyone that they have not first taken away from someone else. Did you vote for the ice cream?

THAT MY FRIEND, IS HOW OBAMA GOT ELECTED...

BY THOSE WHO WANT EVERYTHING FOR FREE!

Sunday, November 25, 2012

Proposed Congressional Reform Act of 2012

I don't know about you, but this is what I'd like to see as a part of congressional reform.

1. No Tenure / No Pension.

A Congressman/woman collects a salary while in office and receives no pay when they're out of office.

2. Congress (past, present & future) participates in Social Security.

All funds in the Congressional retirement fund move to the Social Security system immediately. All future funds flow into the Social Security system, and Congress participates with the American people. It may not be used for any other purpose.

3. Congress can purchase their own retirement plan, just as all Americans do.

4. Congress will no longer vote themselves a pay raise. Congressional pay will rise by the lower of CPI or 3%.

5. Congress loses their current health care system and participates in the same health care system as the American people.

This includes the loss of their health care once they live Congress just as what happens to the rest of us when we leave our job.

6. Congress must equally abide by all laws they impose on the American people.

7. All contracts with past and present Congressmen/women are void effective 12/31/12. The American people did not make this contract with Congressmen/women.

Congressmen/women made all these contracts for themselves.

Serving in Congress is an honor, not a career. The Founding Fathers envisioned citizen legislators, so ours should serve their term(s), then go home and back to work.

Would this be a great dream! Now this is change I can hope and believe in! Talk about moving forward!

A Ford Dealer's Report

I'm passing this message on because even though Obama is still in office, we need to make sure that no one else is allowed to keep the lazy (like this woman) in such riches for nothing!

MAKES U SICK DOESNT IT????

This is exactly why Mitt Romney said that 40 some % of the people are too dependent on the government. They have learned to work the system.

A Ford Dealer's Report

From Tom Selkis (Latham Ford)

True story yesterday at the dealership.....

"I'll try to make this as short and to the point as I can.

One of my salesmen here had a woman in his office yesterday wanting to lease a brand new Focus. As he was reviewing her credit app with her he noticed she was on social security disability. He said to her you don't look like your disabled and unable to work. She said well I'm really not, I could work if I wanted to but I make more now than I did when I was working and got hurt (non-disabling injury).

She said the gov't sends her $1500.00 a month in 1 check, she gets $700.00 a month on an EBT card (food stamps), and $800.00 a month for rent. Oh yeah and 250 minutes free on her phone. That is just south of $3500.00 a month."

I would like to break in at this point and say.... ARE YOU SERIOUS?!?!?!?!

I know that people like this whine about "life's so unfair" and that rich people are "evil," but.... What I really find sad about this woman is that she used to work, but now feels perfectly fine with being totally subserviant to and relayant upon the government.

"When she was working she was taking home about $330.00 per week. Do the math and then ask yourself why the hell should she go back to work. If you multiply that by millions of people you start to realize the scope of the problem we face as a country. Once the socialist have 51% of the population in that same scenario we are finished."

The question is when do we cross that threshold if we haven't already, and there are not enough people working to pay enough taxes to support the non-working people? Riots?? Be prepared to protect your homes."

OK... I feel as though I must break in again.

And this is what has worried me about socialism coming to America. I worry that more and more people are going to look to people like this woman as an example of the way life should be. More and more people are going to be sick and tired of having millions of dependents (both within America and overseas as our government sends more and more aid to countries that like the aid, but hate us in general), yet they are unable to claim them on their taxes they pay. They will be getting sick and tired of getting up early, working longer and longer hours, and being stressed the F@#$ out simply because more and more of their neighbors and fellow Americans would rather take from them for doing nothing outside of simply living.

"The road to success is dotted with many tempting parking places." - Unknown

"She didn't lease the Focus here because the dealer down the road beat our deal by 10.00/month. Glad to know she is so frugal with her hard earned money."

Giving Thanks

This was shared to me by the Solders are Heroes cause group leader from Facebook Causes.

Posted by Blanka Stratford

I'd like to take the time today to thank you all for being part of this great cause and to write a little bit about one of my favorite holidays; Thanksgiving.

Being a Polish immigrant, but spending the larger portion of my childhood in the state of Massachusetts, I was not only aware of the marked differences between me and other children, but also of the concept of an entire new world welcoming me into its arms and forever turning me into what I am now; an American.

The history of Thanksgiving appealed to me because I too was a settler, and like the pioneers who inhabited this continent centuries ago, I too relied on the graciousness and welcoming of those who were here before me. Yet there is a dark side to the narration of this holiday as well, underlining an ongoing struggle that knows no boundaries and afflicts us not only as nations, but as human beings. Here's the story of Thanksgiving and how it applies to our world today:

In 1621, the Wampanoag Native Americans and the Plymouth colonists shared an autumn harvest feast that now serves as the symbol of one of the first Thanksgiving celebrations. Even prior to the arrival of Europeans to this continent, Native Americans already had a merry tradition of celebrating the food reaped from the good earth. But in terms of the colonies and states, it wasn't until 1863; in the midst of the bloody Civil War; that Abraham Lincoln declared a national Thanksgiving Day to be celebrated annually every fourth Thursday of November. A bitter sense of irony could be attested to that Thanksgiving Proclamation, as the war it was founded during mirrored the initial war between European settlers and Native Americans; a war that resulted in the death of millions. Thus, the Proclamation not only proved that no country was or is without fault or susceptibility to destruction, but also demonstrated that one of the most emblematic celebrations a country could have has its roots in bloodshed.

But now let us look deeper. Thanksgiving, above any other day, proved that people could rise from the ashes of deadly discontent to give appreciation and gratefulness to the fruitful fields and the hard labor of others that allowed them to live another day. And it is not just in the United States that this sentiment is felt, embraced and celebrated. Such harvest festivals exist throughout the world and throughout time, from pagan rituals in Britain to Makar Sankrati in India to the Pahiyas rice festival in the Philippines. Who could say no to that fresh barrel of beer during Germany's Oktoberfest? Or some braised cabbage and kielbasa during Poland's Dozynki? And what of the tastes of ancient Persia's Mehregan? Or Israel's Sukkot? Wars have torn these latter nations apart. And yet within each one rest the symbols of hope, light, kindness, faith and love.

This day, give thanks for what you have, for there are others who have far less. Take the time to look around you and appreciate what you've been given, for at any moment it could be taken away. Respect yourselves and each other, for there is no one without the other. And remember; Our future generations may either honor us for our combined efforts and accomplishments, or denounce us for leaving them in a world devoid of what we had.

Happy Thanksgiving, Everyone. And Thank You.

Blanka K. Stratford

Saturday, November 17, 2012

We Support Everyone But Ourselves

Someone please tell me what the HECK's wrong with all the people that run this country!!!!!!

Both Republicans & Democrats

We're "broke" & can't help our own Seniors, Veterans, Orphans, Homeless etc.

In the last years we have provided aid to Haiti, Chile, Pakistan, Lybia, Egypt and Turkey, and Japan.

Literally, BILLIONS of DOLLARS!!!

Our retired seniors living on a "fixed income", receive no aid, nor do they get any breaks, while our government and religious organizations pour Hundreds of Billions Of $$$$$$'s and Tons of Food To Foreign Countries!

We have hundreds of adoptable children who are shoved aside to make room for the adoption of foreign orphans.

AMERICA:
A country where we have homeless without shelter, children going to bed hungry, elderly going without "needed" meds, and mentally ill without treatment -etc. etc.

YET.......................

They have a 'Benefit' for the people of Haiti on 12 TV stations, ships and planes lining up with food, water, tents, clothes, bedding, doctors, and medical supplies.

Imagine if the *GOVERNMENT* gave "US" the same support they give to other countries.

Sad isn't it?

Tuesday, November 6, 2012

Obama's President's Day

From my father.....

I was eating breakfast with my 13-year-old granddaughter and I asked her, "What day is the 20th of February?"

She said "It's President's Day!" She is a smart kid.

I asked "What does President's Day mean?" I was waiting for something about Washington or Lincoln .... etc.

She replied, "President's Day is when President Obama steps out of the White House, and if he sees his shadow we have one more year of unemployment."

Sunday, October 28, 2012

Lesson in Irony

This was sent to me and now I’m passing it on as lesson in irony.

The Food Stamp Program, administered by the U.S. Department of Agriculture, admitted that it is proud to be distributing the greatest amount of free meals and food stamps to 46 million citizens. This is the most that has ever been distributed in their history.

Meanwhile, the National Park Service, administered by the U.S. Department of the Interior, asks us "Please Do Not Feed the Animals." Their stated reason for the policy is because the animals will grow dependent on handouts and will not learn to take care of themselves.

This ends today's lesson.

Obama Curtails Drilling in Oil-Rich Alaskan Reserve

Unbelievable!!!! As you’ll read in this report, gas was $1.48 per gallon the day Obama took office and that’s the truth. It had gone up prior to that day to a high of $4.12 per gallon and the Democrats and the liberal media demonized Bush over it. What did Bush do? On July 14, 2008 he announced that he was going to lift a drilling ban placed by his father back in 1990 and low and behold, gas prices fall nearly $2.50 in a matter of five months! Of course, environmentalists are to blame. These are the same people who said the Alaskan Pipe Line would create great harm to the environment. Yeah… Right… Life is not only surviving around the pipe line, but is thriving at a greater rate than it would have had the pipe line not been there. Seems the heated pipe is good for the environment as it keeps plant life from dying in the winter allowing herbivores to feed off it.

But anyway… On to the story.

The Obama administration, citing environmental concerns, has banned drilling on half of the vast National Petroleum Reserve-Alaska in a move decried even by Alaska’s congressional delegation.

“The price of gasoline, which was $1.84 a gallon the day President Obama took office, has more than doubled since, willfully aided and abetted by an administration that claims we can't drill our way to energy independence as we ignore vast reserves of North American energy that dwarf OPEC's and we sit on 100 years' supply of petroleum,” Investor’s Business Daily (IBD) stated in an editorial.

The National Petroleum Reserve-Alaska (NPRA), not to be confused with the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge (ANWR) to the east, is a 23.5-million-acre, Indiana-sized tract on Alaska’s North Slope. It was established by President Harding in 1923 to ensure oil supplies for the U.S. Navy.

The desolate NPRA has been described as the largest tract of undisturbed public land in the United States and includes a point 120 miles from the nearest village or usable road.

In 1976, the reserve was transferred to the Interior Department and Congress designated it as a strategic oil and natural gas stockpile to meet the “energy needs of the nation.”

But in August, Obama’s Interior Secretary Ken Salazar announced that new drilling would be allowed on half of the reserve while the other half will be off-limits to oil and gas exploration.

Environmentalists had lobbied to protect the habitat of caribou, eider ducks and other Arctic species.

“The move drew praise from environmentalists but sharp criticism from oil and gas proponents who said it would restrict the industry’s ability to tap the nation’s hydrocarbon resources,” the Washington Post reported.


The off-limits portions of the reserve are “the most productive areas” of a tract that IBD says contains 2.7 billion barrels of oil and 114 trillion cubic feet of natural gas.

Alaska’s congressional delegation — Sens. Mark Begich (a Democrat) and Lisa Murkowski, and Rep. Don Young — call the administration’s action “the largest wholesale land withdrawal and blocking of access to an energy resource by the federal government in decades.”

They also said the move “will significantly limit options for a pipeline” through the reserve to transport oil and gas.

Erik Milito, the American Petroleum Institute’s group director of upstream and industry operations, said the plan “continues to leave domestic energy resources, jobs and government revenue off the table.”

IBD concludes: “The move is typical Obama sleight of hand: Take credit for increased oil production on public lands that you had nothing to do with, lock up resources on federal lands with the exception of places the oil companies find unprofitable or unpromising, then blame them, not your administration, for driving up prices.”

Benghazi

After hearing all sorts of stuff in regards to the 9/11 attack in Benghazi, there are a few things that really get me.

If Chris Stevens was asking for extra security because he thought there was a credible threat to him and his staff at the embassy, why were his requests ignored?

You would think that if anyone would know the political situation of an area outside of our boarders, it would be the person actually living in the area! It’s partly the job of the ambassador to know the political atmosphere of the area he/she lives in.

During the attack, why were several requests for support denied?

CIA operatives in the area (the CIA annex) reported the attack upon hearing weapons fire. They contacted their chain of command and were told twice to stand down. After ignoring the order and rescuing as many as they could to annex, they also came under attack. They requested military support, which was also denied. Military support that could have been given had the request not been denied.

Now I’m hearing that there are reports that there were drones in the area. That means that SOMEONE knew exactly what was going on as it was happening. SOMEONE could see the small arms fire directed at the consulate. SOMEONE had to make the decision to take NO action in defense/support of the consulate.

I’ve also heard reports that Obama knew what was going on and that it might have been him that told the CIA to tell their operatives in Benghazi to stand down or at least gave the order not to send the military in for support.

And then there’s Hillary Clinton who took one for the team…. Why?

When she said that “the buck would stop here” (meaning with her as President) during her bid for the Presidency, she should have held the same standard for Obama. While I will say that she shouldn’t just throw him under the bus, she should have let him roast. If I were her, I would have stepped down from the position as Head of State stating that I could not work under conditions where pleads for help from one of our embassies/consulates went basically ignored both prior to and during the attack.

And then there’s Obama’s response to all of this…

He didn’t call it a terrorist attack, but wait… He did! Check the transcripts! *Quiet! He doesn’t want us to know the truth about what he actually said at first!*

He kept blaming that YouTube video on the attack. Oh wait… What??? Are you saying that Obama KNEW that this was a planned terrorist action??? Really??? There were emails to the White House AND the State Department informing them that a Libyan group called Ansar al-Sharia had claimed they were responsible for the planned terrorist attack for the anniversary of 9/11???? Interesting…

Now please correct me if I’m wrong, but…

Had Bush or even McCain been President during all of this, the Democrats and the liberal media would have been calling for imitate impeachment of either man. Furthermore, I also believe both groups would be expecting either man to spend time in “Club Fed” over the deaths of Ambassador Stevens and the 3 others. Rather, they sit and try to defend Obama as best they can as they “search for the truth.” Yeah… Right… Like I’m supposed to believe that’s actually happening.

Sunday, September 30, 2012

Why Mitt Romney is Unlikable

I had originally gotten this from my father, who had gotten this via email. Some things to think about for sure. I'm going to make some personal comments in red bold

A lot is being said in the media about Mitt Romney not being "likable" or that he doesn't "relate well" to people. Frankly, we struggled to understand why. So after much research, we have come up with a Top Ten List to explain this "unlikablility."

Top Ten Reasons To Dislike Mitt Romney:

  1. Drop-dead, collar-ad handsome with gracious, statesman like aura. Looks like every central casting's #1 choice for Commander-in-Chief.


  2. He also doesn't come off as being aloof, unlike Obama who always looks aloof in his pictures.

  3. Been married to ONE woman his entire life, and has been faithful to her, including through her bouts with breast cancer and MS.


  4. And what gets me about this is the left bashes and berates both of them concerning Mrs. Romney's treatments for her MS. Imagine the backlash that would occur if a conservative said the same things about a liberal.

  5. No scandals or skeletons in his closet. (How boring is that?)


  6. This is another thing that gets me. Everyone's so interested in the dirt on others that (espically in politics) the real message gets lost in all the extra BS we're bombarded with.

  7. Can't speak in a fake, southern, "black preacher voice" when necessary.


  8. Can I get a amen!?!?

  9. Highly intelligent. Graduated cum laude from both Harvard Law School and Harvard Business School ...and by the way, his academic records are NOT sealed.


  10. So this means we all know that he's been to school and what kind of grades he got unlike Obama who claims to have gone to some very prestigious colleges, yet no one remembers him during the years he claims to have gone to college. Well... that and the simple fact that Obama refuses to show his records.

  11. Doesn't smoke or drink alcohol, and has never done drugs, not even in the counter-culture age when he went to college. Too square for today's America?


  12. Too square for Obama for sure who at least admitted that he did some drugs in his youth.

  13. Represents an America of "yesterday", where people believed in God, went to Church, didn't screw around, worked hard, and became a SUCCESS!


  14. My father was talking to my wife (who is from the Philippines) one day about this. He told her that when we used to envy the successfully in this country, we did so asking exactly what they did in order to become successful; we wanted to do what they did to become successful. Now, of course, all the left can do is berate the wealthy and call them "evil." Yeah.... the same "evil" people that create the majority of jobs in this country.

  15. Has a family of five great sons....and none of them have police records or are in drug rehab. But of course, they were raised by a stay-at-home mom, and that "choice" deserves America's scorn.


  16. And what gets me about this is that Democrats keep with the whole "war on women" thing, yet they berate Ann for being a stay-at-home mom???? I just don't get it.

  17. Oh yes.....he's a MORMON. We need to be very afraid of that very strange religion that teaches its members to be clean-living, patriotic, fiscally conservative, charitable, self-reliant, and honest.


  18. Ok. I thought (according to the left) that we were supposed to be toleratant of other's religion. Oh wait.... That only applies to religions that are not Christian. Sorry... I forgot about that point.

  19. And one more point.....pundits say because of his wealth, he can't relate to ordinary Americans. I guess that's because he made that money HIMSELF.....as opposed to marrying it (Kerry) or inheriting it from Daddy (yes, some liberals do actually fall into this catagory). Apparently, he didn't understand that actually working at a job and earning your own money made you unrelatable to Americans.


  20. So I guess Obama's $10 million is different some how???? Oh wait.... Of course it is... Duh... He's Obama the Savior and can do no wrong. People are looking to him for his Obama money and Obama is payin fo my house n car and he even gettin me a cell phone! OBAMA!!! OBAMA!!! OBAMA!!!

My goodness, it's a strange world, isn't it?

Personal Information:
  • His full Name is: Willard Mitt Romney
  • He was Born: March 12, 1947 and is 65 years old.
  • His Father: George W. Romney, former Governor of the State of Michigan.
  • He was raised in Bloomfield Hills, Michigan
  • He is Married to Ann Romney since 1969; they five children.


Education:
  • B.A. from Brigham Young University
  • J.D. and M.B.A. from Harvard University


Religion:
  • Mormon - The Church of Jesus Christ of the Latter-Day Saints


Working Background:
  • After high school, he spent 30 months in France as a Mormon missionary.

  • After going to both Harvard Business School and Harvard Law School simultaneously, he passed the Michigan bar exam, but never worked as an attorney.

  • In 1984, he co-founded Bain Capital a private equity investment firm, one of the largest such firms in the United States.

  • In 1994, he ran for Senator of Massachusetts and lost to Ted Kennedy.

  • He was President and CEO of the 2002 Winter Olympic Games.

  • In 2002, he was elected Governor of the State of Massachusetts where he eliminated a 1.5 billion deficit.


Some Interesting Facts about Romney:
  • Bain Capital, starting with one small office supply store in Massachusetts, turned it into Staples; now over 2,000 stores employing 90,000 people.

  • Bain Capital also worked to perform the same kinds of business miracles again and again, with companies like Domino's, Sealy, Brookstone, Weather Channel, Burger King, Warner Music Group, Dollarama, Home Depot Supply and many others.

  • He was an unpaid volunteer campaign worker for his dad's gubernatorial campaign 1 year.

  • He was an unpaid intern in his dad's governor's office for eight years.

  • He was an unpaid bishop and state president of his church for ten years.

  • He was an unpaid President of the Salt Lake Olympic Committee for three years.

  • He took no salary and was the unpaid Governor of Massachusetts for four years.

  • He gave his entire inheritance from his father to charity.

  • Mitt Romney is one of the wealthiest self-made men in our country but has given more back to its citizens in terms of money, service and time than most men.

  • And in 2011 Mitt Romney gave over $4 million to charity, almost 19% of his income.... Just for comparison purposes, Obama gave 1% and Joe Biden gave $300 or .0013%.


Mitt Romney is Trustworthy:
  • He will show us his birth certificate

  • He will show us his high school and college transcripts

  • He will show us his social security card

  • He will show us his law degree

  • He will show us his draft notice

  • He will show us his medical records

  • He will show us his income tax records

  • He will show us he has nothing to hide.


Mitt Romney's background, experience and trustworthiness show him to be a great leader and an excellent citizen for President of the United States.

You may think that Romney may not be the best representative the Republicans could have selected.

At least I know what religion he is, and that he won't desecrate the flag, bow down to foreign powers, or practice fiscal irresponsibility.

I know he has the ability to turn this financial debacle that the current regime has gotten us into.

We won't like all the things necessary to recover from this debt, but someone with Romney's background can do it.

But, on the minus side, he never was a "Community Organizer", never took drugs or smoked pot, never got drunk, did not associate with communists or terrorists, nor did he attend a church whose pastor called for God to damn the US.

Why The Polls Under State Romney Vote‏

By DICK MORRIS
Published on DickMorris.com on September 21, 2012

Republicans are getting depressed under an avalanche of polling suggesting that an Obama victory is in the offing. They, in fact, suggest no such thing! Here's why:

1. All of the polling out there uses some variant of the 2008 election turnout as its model for weighting respondents and this overstates the Democratic vote by a huge margin.

In English, this means that when you do a poll you ask people if they are likely to vote. But any telephone survey always has too few blacks, Latinos, and young people and too many elderly in its sample. That's because some don't have landlines or are rarely at home or don't speak English well enough to be interviewed or don't have time to talk. Elderly are overstated because they tend to be home and to have time. So you need to increase the weight given to interviews with young people, blacks and Latinos and count those with seniors a bit less.

Normally, this task is not difficult. Over the years, the black, Latino, young, and elderly proportion of the electorate has been fairly constant from election to election, except for a gradual increase in the Hispanic vote. You just need to look back at the last election to weight your polling numbers for this one.

But 2008 was no ordinary election. Blacks, for example, usually cast only 11% of the vote, but, in 2008, they made up 14% of the vote. Latinos increased their share of the vote by 1.5% and college kids almost doubled their vote share. Almost all pollsters are using the 2008 turnout models in weighting their samples. Rasmussen, more accurately, uses a mixture of 2008 and 2004 turnouts in determining his sample. That's why his data usually is better for Romney.

But polling indicates a widespread lack of enthusiasm among Obama's core demographic support due to high unemployment, disappointment with his policies and performance, and the lack of novelty in voting for a black candidate now that he has already served as president.

If you adjust virtually any of the published polls to reflect the 2004 vote, not the 2008 vote, they show the race either tied or Romney ahead, a view much closer to reality.

2. Almost all of the published polls show Obama getting less than 50% of the vote and less than 50% job approval. A majority of the voters either support Romney or are undecided in almost every poll.

But the fact is that the undecided vote always goes against the incumbent. In 1980 (the last time an incumbent Democrat was beaten), for example, the Gallup Poll of October 27th had Carter ahead by 45-39. Their survey on November 2nd showed Reagan catching up and leading by three points. In the actual voting, the Republican won by nine. The undecided vote broke sharply -- and unanimously -- for the challenger.

An undecided voter has really decided not to back the incumbent. He just won't focus on the race until later in the game.

So, when the published poll shows Obama ahead by, say, 48-45, he's really probably losing by 52-48!

Add these two factors together and the polls that are out there are all misleading. Any professional pollster (those consultants hired by candidates not by media outlets) would publish two findings for each poll -- one using 2004 turnout modeling and the other using 2008 modeling. This would indicate just how dependent on an unusually high turnout of his base the Obama camp really is.

Sunday, September 2, 2012

An Interesting View of President Obama

Jack Wheeler is a brilliant man who was the author of Reagan's strategy to break the back of the Soviet Union with the star wars race and expose their inner weakness. For years he wrote a weekly intelligence update that was extremely interesting and well structured and informative. He consults(ed) with several mega corporations on global trends and the future, etc. He is in semi-retirement now. He is a true patriot with a no-nonsense approach to everything. He is also a somewhat well-known mountain climber and adventurer.

Written by Dr. Jack Wheeler

The O-man, Barack Hussein Obama, is an eloquently tailored empty suit. No resume, no accomplishments, no experience, no original ideas, no understanding of how the economy works, no understanding of how the world works, no balls, nothing but abstract, empty rhetoric devoid of real substance.

He has no real identity. He is half-white, which he rejects. The rest of him is mostly Arab, which he hides but is disclosed by his non-African Arabic surname and his Arabic first and middle names as a way to triply proclaim his Arabic parentage to people in Kenya. Only a small part of him is African Black from his Luo grandmother, which he pretends he is exclusively.

What he isn't, not a genetic drop of, is 'African-American,' the descendant of enslaved Africans brought to America chained in slave ships. He hasn't a single ancestor who was a slave. Instead, his Arab ancestors were slave owners. Slave-trading was the main Arab business in East Africa for centuries until the British ended it.

Let that sink in: Obama is not the descendant of slaves; he is the descendant of slave owners. Thus he makes the perfect Liberal Messiah.

It's something Hillary doesn't understand - how some complete neophyte came out of the blue and stole the Dem nomination from her. Obamamania is beyond politics and reason. It is a true religious cult whose adherents reject Christianity yet still believe in Original Sin, transferring it from the evil of being human to the evil of being white.

Thus Obama has become the white liberals' Christ, offering absolution from the Sin of Being White. There is no reason or logic behind it, no faults or flaws of his can diminish it, no arguments Hillary could make of any kind can be effective against it. The absurdity of Hypocrisy Clothed In Human Flesh being their Savior is all the more cause for liberals to worship him: Credo quia absurdum, I believe it because it is absurd.

Thank heavens that the voting majority of Americans remain Christian and are in no desperate need of a phony savior.

His candidacy is ridiculous and should not be taken seriously by any thinking American.

Sunday, July 29, 2012

August 1st to September 1st

Well over 50 yrs ago I knew a lady who would not buy Christmas gifts if they were made in China. Her daughter will recognize her in the following.

Did y'all see Diane Sawyer's special report? They removed ALL items from a typical, middle class family's home that were not made in the USA.

There was hardly anything left besides the kitchen sink. Literally. During the special they showed truckloads of items - USA made - being brought in to replace everything and talked about how to find these items and the difference in price etc.

It was interesting that Diane said if every American spent just $64 more than normal on USA made items this year, it would create something like 200,000 new jobs!

I was buying food the other day at Wal Mart and on the label of the some the products it said "From China."

For example, the "Our Family" brand of the mandarin oranges says right on the can "From China."

I was shocked so far a few more cents I bought the Liberty Gold brand or the Dole since it's from California.

Are we Americans as dumb as we appear --- or --- is it that we just do not think. The Chinese, knowingly and intentionally, export inferior and even toxic products and dangerous toys and goods to be sold in American markets.

70% of Americans believe that the trading privileges afforded to the Chinese should be suspended.

Why do you need the government to suspend trading privileges? DO IT YOURSELF, AMERICA !!

Simply look on the bottom of every product you buy, and if it says "Made in China" or "PRC" (and that now includes Hong Kong ), simply choose another product, or none at all. You will be amazed at how dependent you are on Chinese products, and you will be equally amazed at what you can do without.

Who needs plastic eggs to celebrate Easter? If you must have eggs, use real ones and benefit some American farmer. Easter is just an example. The point is do not wait for the government to act. Just go ahead and assume control on your own.

THINK ABOUT THIS: If 200 million Americans each refuse to buy just $20 of Chinese goods, that's a billion dollar trade imbalance resolved in our favor...fast!!

Most of the people who have been reading about this matter are planning on implementing this on Aug. 1st and continue it until Sept. 1st. That is only one month of trading losses, but it will hit the Chinese for 1/12th of the total, or 8%, of their American exports. Then they might have to ask themselves if the benefits of their arrogance and lawlessness were worth it.

Remember, August 1st to Sept. 1st !!!!!! START NOW.

Send this to everybody you know. Let's show them that we are Americans and NOBODY can take us for granted.

If we can't live without cheap Chinese goods for one month out of our lives, WE DESERVE WHAT WE GET!

Pass it on, America ...

Sunday, July 8, 2012

President and Chief Justice Barack H. Obama?‏

This was originally sent to me by the Liberty Counsel.

There have been many disturbing questions circulated by news sources and Internet blog sites for the past several days concerning the recent Supreme Court ruling on ObamaCare’s constitutionality. Among the most concerning of those questions:

“Did President Obama directly or indirectly influence the Supreme Court’s decision?”

Our system of checks and balances has been subverted.

We know from his own statements and writings that Barack Obama believes the Supreme Court, and every other government institution for that matter, should be an agent of “change.”

In 2001, referring to Chief Justice Earl Warren’s Court of the 1950s and 1960s, Barack Obama told a WBEZ Chicago radio audience…

“But the Supreme Court never ventured into the issues of redistribution of wealth and sort of more basic issues of political and economic justice in this society.

And, to that extent, as radical as I think people try to characterize the Warren Court, it wasn't that radical. It didn't break free from the essential constraints that were placed by the Founding Fathers in the Constitution, at least as it's been interpreted, and the Warren Court interpreted it in the same way that, generally, the Constitution is a charter of negative liberties.

“It [the Constitution] says what the states can't do to you, says what the federal government can't do to you, but it doesn't say what the federal government or the state government must do on your behalf, and that hasn't shifted.”


In that revealing 2001 radio interview, Barack Obama was clearly disappointed in the lack of “change” that had been effected by past Supreme Court decisions. In it, he called redistribution of wealth “political and social justice.”

Could Barack Obama have been any more critical of our foundational charter of American liberty?

In contrast to Mr. Obama’s view, here’s a fundamental fact about the Constitution of the United States of America:

The Constitution was written to protect citizens FROM government while narrowly defining the federal government’s limited powers and spreading its authority among three distinct branches.


In fact, the Founders gave us a form of government designed to protect the people’s freedom from tyrannical despots intent on overpowering their liberties!

If I may break into all of this right quick.... I think it's SO sad and upsetting that what our founding fathers fought against, Obama and his supporters are fighting to re-establish. And that is government that exists not to serve the people, but to control the people. They fought King George to free themselves from the opression of government with unlimited power. They also set us up with a form of government where three branches exist so that no one branch has more power than the other; a.k.a. goverment with checks and balances. Now, Obama's supporters are more than happy to allow him to do basically what ever he wants so long as they are taken care of. Of course, he has established that he's more than willing to subvert the other two branches in order to advance his agenda of increased government control.

Ok... getting off my soap box and back to this posting.


Barack Obama’s intimidating, condescending style of governance.

As you may recall, President Obama on several occasions has used his “bully pulpit” to chide and intimidate Supreme Court Justices.

In his 2010 State of the Union Address, he literally dressed down the court justices in front of Congress and the nation.

In the months leading up to the Court’s ObamaCare decision, he virtually threatened the Court if they were to strike the law down.

Just this week, in a campaign event in Maumee, Ohio, the President forcefully made this telling statement in his address…

“The law I passed is here to stay.”


Wait a minute, Mr. President! In America, the Legislature passes laws, not the Executive Branch!

However it came to be that the absurdly misnamed “Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act” was passed and declared to be constitutional, it remains an UNJUST LAW!

Sunday, June 10, 2012

2012 Democratic National Convention Schedule

4:00 PM Opening Flag Burning Ceremony

4:05 PM Singing of "God Damn America" led by Rev. Jeremiah Wright

4:10 PM Pledge of Allegiance to Obama

4:15 PM Ceremonial 'I hate America' led by Michelle Obama

4:30 PM Tips on Dodging Sniper Fire , Hillary Clinton

4:45 PM Al Sharpton Leads Castrati Choir in Singing "Great Balls of Fire"

5:00 PM UFO Abduction Survival, Joe Biden

5:30 PM Eliot Spitzer Speaks on "Family Values" via Satellite

5:45 PM Tribute to All 57 States

6:00 PM Joe Biden Delivers 100,000-Word Speech Featuring 23-Minute Question and 2-Hour Answer

8:30 PM Airing of Grievances by the Clintons

9:00 PM Bill Clinton Delivers Rousing Endorsement of Obama Girl

9:15 PM Tribute Film to Freedom Fighters at Gitmo, Michael Moore

9:45 PM Personal Finance Seminar -Charlie Rangel

10:00 PM Denunciation of Bitter Gun Owners

10:30 PM Ceremonial Waving of White Flagfor IRAQ & Afghanistan

11:00 PM Obama Energy Plan Symposium / Tire Gauge Demonstration

11:15 PM Free Gov. Blagojevich rally

11:30 PM Obama Accepts Tony and Latin Grammy Awards

11:45 PM Feeding of the Delegates with 5 Loaves and 2 Fish, Obama Presiding

12:00 AM Official Nomination of Obama by Bill Maher

12:01 AM Obama Accepts Nomination as Lord and Savior

12:05 AM Celestial Choirs Sing

03:00 AM Biden Delivers Acceptance Speech

Neal Boortz Texas A&M Commencement Address‏

120605 Excellent College Commencement Speech to Teach Graduates About the Realities of Life and the Differences Between Liberal/Loser Mentality and the Conservative/Winner Mentality

Neal Boortz Texas A&M Commencement Address‏

The students gave a standing ovation; the faculty were deathly silent!

Neal Boortz is a Texan, a lawyer, a Texas Aggie (Texas A&M) graduate, and now a nationally syndicated talk show host from Atlanta. His commencement address to the graduates of a recent Texas A&M class is far different from what either the students or the faculty expected. Whether you agree or disagree, his views are certainly thought provoking.

"I am honored by the invitation to address you on this august occasion. It's about time. Be warned, however, that I am not here to impress you; you'll have enough smoke blown up your bloomers today. And you can bet your tassels I'm not here to impress the faculty and administration. You may not like much of what I have to say, and that's fine. You will remember it though. Especially after about 10 years out there in the real world. This, it goes without saying, does not apply to those of you who will seek your careers and your fortunes as government employees.

This gowned gaggle behind me is your faculty. You've heard the old saying that those who can - do. Those who can't - teach. That sounds deliciously insensitive. But there is often raw truth in insensitivity, just as you often find feel-good falsehoods and lies in compassion. Say good-bye to your faculty because now you are getting ready to go out there and do. These folks behind me are going to stay right here and teach.

By the way, just because you are leaving this place with a diploma doesn't mean the learning is over. When an FAA flight examiner handed me my private pilot's license many years ago, he said, “Here, this is your ticket to learn.” The same can be said for your diploma. Believe me, the learning has just begun.

Now, I realize that most of you consider yourselves Liberals. In fact, you are probably very proud of your liberal views. You care so much. You feel so much. You want to help so much. After all, you're a compassionate and caring person, aren't you now? Well, isn't that just so extraordinarily special. Now, at this age, is as good a time as any to be a liberal; as good a time as any to know absolutely everything. You have plenty of time, starting tomorrow, for the truth to set in.

Over the next few years, as you begin to feel the cold breath of reality down your neck, things are going to start changing pretty fast... Including your own assessment of just how much you really know.

So here are the first assignments for your initial class in reality: Pay attention to the news, read newspapers, and listen to the words and phrases that proud Liberals use to promote their causes. Then, compare the words of the left to the words and phrases you hear from those evil, heartless, greedy conservatives. From the Left you will hear "I feel." From the Right you will hear "I think." From the Liberals you will hear references to groups -- The Blacks, the Poor, the Rich, the Disadvantaged, the Less Fortunate. From the Right you will hear references to individuals. On the Left you hear talk of group rights; on the Right, individual rights.

That about sums it up, really: Liberals feel. Liberals care. They are pack animals whose identity is tied up in group dynamics. Conservatives think -- and, setting aside the theocracy crowd, their identity is centered on the individual.

Liberals feel that their favored groups have enforceable rights to the property and services of productive individuals. Conservatives, I among them I might add, think that individuals have the right to protect their lives and their property from the plunder of the masses.

In college you developed a group mentality, but if you look closely at your diplomas you will see that they have your individual names on them. Not the name of your school mascot, or of your fraternity or sorority, but your name. Your group identity is going away. Your recognition and appreciation of your individual identity starts now.

If, by the time you reach the age of 30, you do not consider yourself to be a conservative, rush right back here as quickly as you can and apply for a faculty position. These people will welcome you with open arms.v They will welcome you, that is, so long as you haven't developed an individual identity. Once again you will have to be willing to sign on to the group mentality you embraced during the past four years.

Something is going to happen soon that is going to really open your eyes. You're going to actually get a full time job!

You're also going to get a lifelong work partner. This partner isn't going to help you do your job. This partner is just going to sit back and wait for payday. This partner doesn't want to share in your effort, but in your earnings.

Your new lifelong partner is actually an agent; an agent representing a strange and diverse group of people; an agent for every teenager with an illegitimate child; an agent for a research scientist who wanted to make some cash answering the age-old question of why monkeys grind their teeth. An agent for some poor demented hippie who considers herself to be a meaningful and talented artist, but who just can't manage to sell any of her artwork on the open market.

Your new partner is an agent for every person with limited, if any, job skills, but who wanted a job at City Hall. An agent for tin-horn dictators in fancy military uniforms grasping for American foreign aid. An agent for multi-million dollar companies who want someone else to pay for their overseas advertising. An agent for everybody who wants to use the unimaginable power of this agent's for their personal enrichment and benefit.

That agent is our wonderful, caring, compassionate, oppressive government. Believe me, you will be awed by the unimaginable power this agent has. Power that you do not have. A power that no individual has, or will have. This agent has the legal power to use force, deadly force to accomplish its goals.

You have no choice here. Your new friend is just going to walk up to you, introduce itself rather gruffly, hand you a few forms to fill out, and move right on in. Say hello to your own personal one ton gorilla. It will sleep anywhere it wants to.

Now, let me tell you, this agent is not cheap. As you become successful it will seize about 40% of everything you earn. And no, I'm sorry, there just isn't any way you can fire this agent of plunder, and you can't decrease its share of your income. That power rests with him, not you.

So, here I am saying negative things to you about government. Well, be clear on this: It is not wrong to distrust government. It is not wrong to fear government. In certain cases it is not even wrong to despise government for government is inherently evil. Yes, a necessary evil, but dangerous nonetheless, somewhat like a drug. Just as a drug that in the proper dosage can save your life, an overdose of government can be fatal.

Now let's address a few things that have been crammed into your minds at this university. There are some ideas you need to expunge as soon as possible. These ideas may work well in academic environment, but they fail miserably out there in the real world.

First is that favorite buzz word of the media and academia: Diversity! You have been taught that the real value of any group of people - be it a social group, an employee group, a management group, whatever - is based on diversity. This is a favored liberal ideal because diversity is based not on an individual’s abilities or character, but on a person's identity and status as a member of a group. Yes, it's that liberal group identity thing again.

Within the great diversity movement group identification - be it racial, gender based, or some other minority status - means more than the individuals integrity, character or other qualifications.

Brace yourself. You are about to move from this academic atmosphere where diversity rules, to a workplace and a culture where individual achievement and excellence actually count. No matter what your professors have taught you over the last four years, you are about to learn that diversity is absolutely no replacement for excellence, ability, and individual hard work. From this day on every single time you hear the word "diversity" you can rest assured that there is someone close by who is determined to rob you of every vestige of individuality you possess.

We also need to address this thing you seem to have about "rights." We have witnessed an obscene explosion of so-called "rights" in the last few decades, usually emanating from college campuses.

You know the mantra: You have the right to a job. The right to a place to live. The right to a living wage. The right to health care. The right to an education. You probably even have your own pet right - the right to a Beemer for instance, or the right to have someone else provide for that child you plan on downloading in a year or so.

Forget it. Forget those rights! I'll tell you what your rights are. You have a right to live free, and to the results of 60% -75% of your labor. I'll also tell you have no right to any portion of the life or labor of another.

You may, for instance, think that you have a right to health care. After all, President Obama said so, didn't he? But you cannot receive health-care unless some doctor or health practitioner surrenders some of his time - his life - to you. He may be willing to do this for compensation, but that's his choice. You have no "right" to his time or property. You have no right to his or any other person's life or to any portion thereof.

You may also think you have some "right" to a job; a job with a living wage, whatever that is. Do you mean to tell me that you have a right to force your services on another person, and then the right to demand that this person compensate you with their money? Sorry, forget it. I am sure you would scream if some urban outdoors men (that would be "homeless person" for those of you who don't want to give these less fortunate people a romantic and adventurous title) came to you and demanded his job and your money.

The people who have been telling you about all the rights you have are simply exercising one of theirs - the right to be imbeciles. Their being imbeciles didn't cost anyone else either property or time. It's their right, and they exercise it brilliantly.

By the way, did you catch my use of the phrase "less fortunate" a bit ago when I was talking about the urban outdoors men? That phrase is a favorite of the Left. Think about it, and you'll understand why.

To imply that one person is homeless, destitute, dirty, drunk, spaced out on drugs, unemployable, and generally miserable because he is "less fortunate" is to imply that a successful person - one with a job, a home and a future - is in that position because he or she was "fortunate." The dictionary says that fortunate means "having derived good from an unexpected place." There is nothing unexpected about deriving good from hard work. There is also nothing unexpected about deriving misery from choosing drugs, alcohol, and the street.

If the Liberal Left can create the common perception that success and failure are simple matters of "fortune" or "luck," then it is easy to promote and justify their various income redistribution schemes. After all, we are just evening out the odds a little bit. This "success equals luck" idea the liberals like to push is seen everywhere. Former Democratic presidential candidate Richard Gephardt refers to high-achievers as "people who have won life's lottery." He wants you to believe they are making the big bucks because they are lucky. It's not luck, my friends. It's choice. One of the greatest lessons I ever learned was in a book by Og Mandino, entitled, "The Greatest Secret in the World." The lesson? Very simple: "Use wisely your power of choice."

That bum sitting on a heating grate, smelling like a wharf rat? He's there by choice. He is there because of the sum total of the choices he has made in his life. This truism is absolutely the hardest thing for some people to accept, especially those who consider themselves to be victims of something or other - victims of discrimination, bad luck, the system, capitalism, whatever. After all, nobody really wants to accept the blame for his or her position in life. Not when it is so much easier to point and say, "Look! He did this to me!" than it is to look into a mirror and say, "You S. O. B.! You did this to me!"

The key to accepting responsibility for your life is to accept the fact that your choices, every one of them, are leading you inexorably to either success or failure, however you define those terms.

Some of the choices are obvious: Whether or not to stay in school. Whether or not to get pregnant. Whether or not to hit the bottle. Whether or not to keep this job you hate until you get another better-paying job. Whether or not to save some of your money, or saddle yourself with huge payments for that new car.

Some of the choices are seemingly insignificant: Whom to go to the movies with. Whose car to ride home in. Whether to watch the tube tonight, or read a book on investing. But, and you can be sure of this, each choice counts. Each choice is a building block - some large, some small. But each one is a part of the structure of your life. If you make the right choices, or if you make more right choices than wrong ones, something absolutely terrible may happen to you. Something unthinkable. You, my friend, could become one of the hated, the evil, the ugly, the feared, the filthy, the successful, the rich.

The rich basically serve two purposes in this country. First, they provide the investments, the investment capital, and the brains for the formation of new businesses. Businesses that hire people. Businesses that send millions of paychecks home each week to the un-rich.

Second, the rich are a wonderful object of ridicule, distrust, and hatred. Few things are more valuable to a politician than the envy most Americans feel for the evil rich.

Envy is a powerful emotion. Even more powerful than the emotional minefield that surrounded Bill Clinton when he reviewed his last batch of White House interns. Politicians use envy to get votes and power. And they keep that power by promising the envious that the envied will be punished: "The rich will pay their fair share of taxes if I have anything to do with it." The truth is that the top 10% of income earners in this country pays almost 50% of all income taxes collected. I shudder to think what these job producers would be paying if our tax system were any more "fair."

You have heard, no doubt, that the rich get richer and the poor get poorer. Interestingly enough, our government's own numbers show that many of the poor actually get richer, and that quite a few of the rich actually get poorer. But for the rich who do actually get richer, and the poor who remain poor .. there's an explanation -- a reason. The rich, you see, keep doing the things that make them rich; while the poor keep doing the things that make them poor.

Speaking of the poor, during your adult life you are going to hear an endless string of politicians bemoaning the plight of the poor. So, you need to know that under our government's definition of "poor" you can have a $5 million net worth, a $300,000 home and a new $90,000 Mercedes, all completely paid for. You can also have a maid, cook, and valet, and a million in your checking account, and you can still be officially defined by our government as "living in poverty." Now there's something you haven't seen on the evening news.

How does the government pull this one off? Very simple, really. To determine whether or not some poor soul is "living in poverty," the government measures one thing -- just one thing. Income.

It doesn't matter one bit how much you have, how much you own, how many cars you drive or how big they are, whether or not your pool is heated, whether you winter in Aspen and spend the summers in the Bahamas, or how much is in your savings account. It only matters how much income you claim in that particular year. This means that if you take a one-year leave of absence from your high-paying job and decide to live off the money in your savings and checking accounts while you write the next great American novel, the government says you are living in poverty."

This isn't exactly what you had in mind when you heard these gloomy statistics, is it? Do you need more convincing? Try this. The government's own statistics show that people who are said to be "living in poverty" spend more than $1.50 for each dollar of income they claim. Something is a bit fishy here. Just remember all this the next time Charles Gibson tells you about some hideous new poverty statistics.

Why has the government concocted this phony poverty scam? Because the government needs an excuse to grow and to expand its social welfare programs, which translates into an expansion of its power. If the government can convince you, in all your compassion, that the number of "poor" is increasing, it will have all the excuse it needs to sway an electorate suffering from the advanced stages of Obsessive-Compulsive Compassion Disorder.

I'm about to be stoned by the faculty here. They've already changed their minds about that honorary degree I was going to get. That's OK, though. I still have my PhD. in Insensitivity from the Neal Boortz Institute for Insensitivity Training. I learned that, in short, sensitivity sucks. It's a trap. Think about it - the truth knows no sensitivity. Life can be insensitive. Wallow too much in sensitivity and you'll be unable to deal with life, or the truth, so get over it.

Now, before the dean has me shackled and hauled off, I have a few random thoughts.

  • You need to register to vote, unless you are on welfare. If you are living off the efforts of others, please do us the favor of sitting down and shutting up until you are on your own again.


  • When you do vote, your votes for the House and the Senate are more important than your vote for President. The House controls the purse strings, so concentrate your awareness there.


  • Liars cannot be trusted, even when the liar is the President of the country. If someone can't deal honestly with you, send them packing.


  • Don't bow to the temptation to use the government as an instrument of plunder. If it is wrong for you to take money from someone else who earned it -- to take their money by force for your own needs -- then it is certainly just as wrong for you to demand that the government step forward and do this dirty work for you.


  • Don't look in other people's pockets. You have no business there. What they earn is theirs. What you earn is yours. Keep it that way. Nobody owes you anything, except to respect your privacy and your rights, and leave you the hell alone.


  • Speaking of earning, the revered 40-hour workweek is for losers. Forty hours should be considered the minimum, not the maximum. You don't see highly successful people clocking out of the office every afternoon at five. The losers are the ones caught up in that afternoon rush hour. The winners drive home in the dark.


  • Free speech is meant to protect unpopular speech. Popular speech, by definition, needs no protection.


  • Finally (and aren't you glad to hear that word), as Og Mandino wrote,


  1. Proclaim your rarity. Each of you is a rare and unique human being.


  2. Use wisely your power of choice.


  3. Go the extra mile, drive home in the dark.


Oh, and put off buying a television set as long as you can. Now, if you have any idea at all what's good for you, you will get out of here and never come back. Class dismissed"

Sunday, June 3, 2012

George Patton today

I visualize General George Patton addressing everyone today. It would go something like this......



ATTENTION!



To ALL those whining, panty-waisted, pathetic Citizens, it's time for a little refresher course on exactly why we Americans occasionally have to fight wars to keep this nation great.



See if you can tear yourself away from your "reality" TV and Starbucks for a minute, pull your head out of your ass -- and LISTEN UP!!



Abu Ghraib is not "torture" or an "atrocity."

Got that?



THIS IS an atrocity!





So Was This!!!



WHICH PART DON'T YOU GET?



Islam extremists are peaceful people?

My Ass!

Millions of these warped misled sons-of-bitches are plotting, as we speak, to destroy our country and our way of life any way they can. Some of them are here among us now.

They don't want to convert you and don't want to rule you. They believe you are a vile infestation of Allah's paradise. They don't give a shit how "progressive" you are, how peace-loving you are, or how much you sympathize with their cause. They want your ass dead, and they think it is God's will for them to do it.

Some think if we give them a hug or listen to them, then they'll like us, and if you agree -

Then you are a pathetic dumb ass!

If they manage to get their hands on a nuke,chemical agents, or even some anthrax -- you will wish to God we had hunted them down and killed THEM while we had the chance.

How many more Americans must be beheaded?

You've fallen asleep AGAIN - get your head out of your ass!

You may never get another chance!

NOW GET OFF YOUR SORRY ASS and pass this on to any and every person you give a damn about - if you ever gave a damn about anything!



DISMISSED!